Parthenon Frieze, British Museum

parthenon frieze British Museum
There is probably room for debate about whether or not the British should have taken (or should return) all the sculpture from the Parthenon in Athens which they removed in the early 19th Century. Of course, one should note that the Greeks occupying Ottoman Turks had used the Parthenon for a powder magazine in a war with the Venetians in the 17th Century and that the reason many of the sculptures were in such bad condition is that, not surprisingly, the Parthenon had been blown up during a battle. Combine that with the fact that the British Museum has provided a huge, well sheltered, display for two centuries (something the Greeks only got around to recently,) and that the British Museum gets more than 6 million visitors each year, and I’m not feeling too sorry for the Greeks. (The above has been corrected, thanks to a commenter below.)

7 Responses to Parthenon Frieze, British Museum

  1. Suzanne Fluhr (Just One Boomer) June 10, 2013 at 1:13 pm #

    Yeah. My knee jerk 60’s liberal reaction is to think the British were imperialist dogs to help themselves to all that patrimony from other countries. On the other hand, as you point out, they keep it meticulously and display it to the public—for free, no less. Then, there’s the Taliban, blowing up ancient Buddhas because they some how offended their religious sensibilities and suddenly, the British model looks more than a tad better.
    Suzanne Fluhr (Just One Boomer) recently posted…Philadelphia Phriday — Just Breathe: Welcoming the American Thoracic Society to the City of Brotherly Love (and Sisterly Affection)My Profile

  2. Tom Bartel June 10, 2013 at 4:29 pm #

    And, as the most powerful nation on earth for almost four centuries, they have privileges…and obligations. Both of which they took seriously. Since we’ve been the most powerful nation, we’ve only stolen money, which is rather banal of us, don’t you think?
    Tom Bartel recently posted…An Architectural Tour of TorontoMy Profile

  3. MiamiJayhawk June 11, 2013 at 6:57 am #

    Your history is wrong in this instance. It wasn’t the Greeks who stored munitions in the Parthenon, but rather the Ottoman Turks. The Turks conquered Athens in 1458 and first used the temple as a mosque. Over the the next two hundred years, as Athens declined in population and importance, the Parthenon served other purposes and finally was a munitions storehouse. The besieging Venetians didn’t blow it up on purpose but rather it was a stray shell that caused the explosion.

    When Lord Elgin acquired the “Elgin Marbles” he did so in a deal with the local Turkish ruler.

    • Tom Bartel June 11, 2013 at 7:04 am #

      Yes, you’re right about the Turks. Thanks for the correction. Sorry for my faulty memory. As for the Venetians blowing it up, I was under the impression that munitions storage is certainly a valid, and inviting, target. Probably not a stray shot, is my guess.

  4. Philosykos December 7, 2014 at 8:49 am #

    Thanks to MiamiJayHawk for correcting your mistake in the history.As for not feeling “too sorry for the Greeks”..I think its a shame you would make a comment like that.The Marbles belong back in Greece where they were taken from WRONGLY..And as for not having a proper place to display them for so long…well can you really compare a small country like Greece to the U.K. and its resources?Yes..they were late in getting it done..but they they always do.

    • Tom Bartel December 7, 2014 at 10:22 am #

      And, in the intervening almost 200 years, the soft marble would have been subject to the prodigious pollution of Athens, and they would look like the friezes that are in the Athens museum now, instead of how they look in the British Museum–which is much better. I don’t think it would be a bad idea to return them to Greece, now that there is a place to put them. I think some sort of negotiation of sharing them so that a portion returns and other artifacts are “loaned” to replace them would be a good compromise. Then, there’s the question, if you begin repatriating every work of art that was removed from one country to another, where would it stop? Every museum in the world would be the poorer, as would all the people who would be deprived of seeing art from the rest of the world.
      Tom Bartel recently posted…The Matterhorn, Black and White, Zermatt, SwitzerlandMy Profile

    • Tom Bartel December 7, 2014 at 10:26 am #

      Oh, and there was a previous discussion of repatriation here:
      Tom Bartel recently posted…Four views of The Matterhorn, Zermatt, SwitzerlandMy Profile

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge